Vladimir Dayants vs Stamat Petkov
CL1-2006.03.06, 2006 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Vladimir Dayants vs Stamat Petkov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Vladimir Dayants (2113)
- Black
- Stamat Petkov (2324)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- CL1-2006.03.06
- Year
- 2006
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92)
About this chess game
This chess game between Vladimir Dayants (2113) and Stamat Petkov (2324) was played at CL1-2006.03.06 in 2006 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Vladimir Dayants games or Stamat Petkov games? This Vladimir Dayants vs Stamat Petkov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Vladimir Dayants vs Stamat Petkov?
Vladimir Dayants vs Stamat Petkov (2006) finished 0–1, a win for Stamat Petkov.
What opening was played in Vladimir Dayants vs Stamat Petkov?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (ECO B92).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Vladimir Dayants vs Stamat Petkov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.