Samir Davidov vs Rufat Nasibov
Vugar Gashimov Open 2025, 2025 · Result 1–0 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Botvinnik System (E49).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Samir Davidov vs Rufat Nasibov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Samir Davidov (2251)
- Black
- Rufat Nasibov (1985)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Vugar Gashimov Open 2025
- Year
- 2025
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Botvinnik System (E49)
About this chess game
This chess game between Samir Davidov (2251) and Rufat Nasibov (1985) was played at Vugar Gashimov Open 2025 in 2025 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Botvinnik System (E49). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Samir Davidov games or Rufat Nasibov games? This Samir Davidov vs Rufat Nasibov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Botvinnik System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Samir Davidov vs Rufat Nasibov?
Samir Davidov vs Rufat Nasibov (2025) finished 1–0, a win for Samir Davidov.
What opening was played in Samir Davidov vs Rufat Nasibov?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Botvinnik System (ECO E49).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Samir Davidov vs Rufat Nasibov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.