Remigijus Davidavicius vs Dr. Herbert Nagel
EU/WS/M/046, 2012 · Result 1–0 · Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Remigijus Davidavicius vs Dr. Herbert Nagel with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Remigijus Davidavicius (2191)
- Black
- Dr. Herbert Nagel (2307)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- EU/WS/M/046
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85)
About this chess game
This chess game between Remigijus Davidavicius (2191) and Dr. Herbert Nagel (2307) was played at EU/WS/M/046 in 2012 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Remigijus Davidavicius games or Dr. Herbert Nagel games? This Remigijus Davidavicius vs Dr. Herbert Nagel encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Remigijus Davidavicius vs Dr. Herbert Nagel?
Remigijus Davidavicius vs Dr. Herbert Nagel (2012) finished 1–0, a win for Remigijus Davidavicius.
What opening was played in Remigijus Davidavicius vs Dr. Herbert Nagel?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (ECO D85).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Remigijus Davidavicius vs Dr. Herbert Nagel, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.