Isaac Pereira Dantas vs Daniel Torres Rodrigues
2011 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Gambit Declined: Ragozin Defense (D38).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Isaac Pereira Dantas vs Daniel Torres Rodrigues with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Isaac Pereira Dantas (1601)
- Black
- Daniel Torres Rodrigues (2223)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Ragozin Defense (D38)
About this chess game
This chess game between Isaac Pereira Dantas (1601) and Daniel Torres Rodrigues (2223) was played in 2011 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Ragozin Defense (D38). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Isaac Pereira Dantas games or Daniel Torres Rodrigues games? This Isaac Pereira Dantas vs Daniel Torres Rodrigues encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Ragozin Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Isaac Pereira Dantas vs Daniel Torres Rodrigues?
Isaac Pereira Dantas vs Daniel Torres Rodrigues (2011) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Isaac Pereira Dantas vs Daniel Torres Rodrigues?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Ragozin Defense (ECO D38).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Isaac Pereira Dantas vs Daniel Torres Rodrigues, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.