Isaac Pereira Dantas vs Rafael Henrique Pinto
2014 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation, Spielmann Defense (A32).
Analyze this game
Open Isaac Pereira Dantas vs Rafael Henrique Pinto on the CipherChess board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Open the Analysis BoardMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Isaac Pereira Dantas (1603)
- Black
- Rafael Henrique Pinto (2063)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation, Spielmann Defense (A32)
About this chess game
This chess game between Isaac Pereira Dantas (1603) and Rafael Henrique Pinto (2063) was played in 2014 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation, Spielmann Defense (A32). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Isaac Pereira Dantas games or Rafael Henrique Pinto games? This Isaac Pereira Dantas vs Rafael Henrique Pinto encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation, Spielmann Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Isaac Pereira Dantas vs Rafael Henrique Pinto?
Isaac Pereira Dantas vs Rafael Henrique Pinto (2014) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Isaac Pereira Dantas vs Rafael Henrique Pinto?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation, Spielmann Defense (ECO A32).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Isaac Pereira Dantas vs Rafael Henrique Pinto, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.