Francisco Dantas vs Sergio Murilo de Araujo Pereira
2015 · Result ½–½ · Slav Defense: Exchange Variation (D13).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Francisco Dantas vs Sergio Murilo de Araujo Pereira with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Francisco Dantas (1945)
- Black
- Sergio Murilo de Araujo Pereira (2083)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Exchange Variation (D13)
About this chess game
This chess game between Francisco Dantas (1945) and Sergio Murilo de Araujo Pereira (2083) was played in 2015 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Slav Defense: Exchange Variation (D13). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Francisco Dantas games or Sergio Murilo de Araujo Pereira games? This Francisco Dantas vs Sergio Murilo de Araujo Pereira encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Francisco Dantas vs Sergio Murilo de Araujo Pereira?
Francisco Dantas vs Sergio Murilo de Araujo Pereira (2015) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Francisco Dantas vs Sergio Murilo de Araujo Pereira?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Exchange Variation (ECO D13).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Francisco Dantas vs Sergio Murilo de Araujo Pereira, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.