Roberto Dantas vs Gerard De Jesus Vilajoliu
SI.2005.0.00037, 2005 · Result 0–1 · Pirc Defense: Classical Variation (B08).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Roberto Dantas vs Gerard De Jesus Vilajoliu with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Roberto Dantas (1848)
- Black
- Gerard De Jesus Vilajoliu (2129)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- SI.2005.0.00037
- Year
- 2005
- Opening
- Pirc Defense: Classical Variation (B08)
About this chess game
This chess game between Roberto Dantas (1848) and Gerard De Jesus Vilajoliu (2129) was played at SI.2005.0.00037 in 2005 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Pirc Defense: Classical Variation (B08). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Roberto Dantas games or Gerard De Jesus Vilajoliu games? This Roberto Dantas vs Gerard De Jesus Vilajoliu encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Pirc Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Roberto Dantas vs Gerard De Jesus Vilajoliu?
Roberto Dantas vs Gerard De Jesus Vilajoliu (2005) finished 0–1, a win for Gerard De Jesus Vilajoliu.
What opening was played in Roberto Dantas vs Gerard De Jesus Vilajoliu?
The game opened with the Pirc Defense: Classical Variation (ECO B08).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Roberto Dantas vs Gerard De Jesus Vilajoliu, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.