Henrik Danielsen vs Alan Tate
18. European Teams, 2011 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Henrik Danielsen vs Alan Tate with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Henrik Danielsen (2542)
- Black
- Alan Tate (2334)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 18. European Teams
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94)
About this chess game
This chess game between Henrik Danielsen (2542) and Alan Tate (2334) was played at 18. European Teams in 2011 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Henrik Danielsen games or Alan Tate games? This Henrik Danielsen vs Alan Tate encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Henrik Danielsen vs Alan Tate?
Henrik Danielsen vs Alan Tate (2011) finished 1–0, a win for Henrik Danielsen.
What opening was played in Henrik Danielsen vs Alan Tate?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (ECO E94).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Henrik Danielsen vs Alan Tate, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.