Nils Damm vs Robert Baskin
2010 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Nils Damm vs Robert Baskin with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Nils Damm (1639)
- Black
- Robert Baskin (1869)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29)
About this chess game
This chess game between Nils Damm (1639) and Robert Baskin (1869) was played in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Nils Damm games or Robert Baskin games? This Nils Damm vs Robert Baskin encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Nils Damm vs Robert Baskin?
Nils Damm vs Robert Baskin (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Nils Damm vs Robert Baskin?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (ECO A29).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Nils Damm vs Robert Baskin, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.