Angelo Damia vs Giovanni Marchesich
7. Palmanova Open 2018, 2018 · Result 0–1 · King's Gambit Declined: Falkbeer Countergambit (C31).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Angelo Damia vs Giovanni Marchesich with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Angelo Damia (2261)
- Black
- Giovanni Marchesich (1948)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 7. Palmanova Open 2018
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- King's Gambit Declined: Falkbeer Countergambit (C31)
About this chess game
This chess game between Angelo Damia (2261) and Giovanni Marchesich (1948) was played at 7. Palmanova Open 2018 in 2018 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Gambit Declined: Falkbeer Countergambit (C31). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Angelo Damia games or Giovanni Marchesich games? This Angelo Damia vs Giovanni Marchesich encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Gambit Declined: Falkbeer Countergambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Angelo Damia vs Giovanni Marchesich?
Angelo Damia vs Giovanni Marchesich (2018) finished 0–1, a win for Giovanni Marchesich.
What opening was played in Angelo Damia vs Giovanni Marchesich?
The game opened with the King's Gambit Declined: Falkbeer Countergambit (ECO C31).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Angelo Damia vs Giovanni Marchesich, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.