Martijn Dambacher vs Markus Schaefer
2008 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Martijn Dambacher vs Markus Schaefer with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Martijn Dambacher (2485)
- Black
- Markus Schaefer (1773)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2008
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94)
About this chess game
This chess game between Martijn Dambacher (2485) and Markus Schaefer (1773) was played in 2008 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Martijn Dambacher games or Markus Schaefer games? This Martijn Dambacher vs Markus Schaefer encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Martijn Dambacher vs Markus Schaefer?
Martijn Dambacher vs Markus Schaefer (2008) finished 1–0, a win for Martijn Dambacher.
What opening was played in Martijn Dambacher vs Markus Schaefer?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (ECO E94).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Martijn Dambacher vs Markus Schaefer, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.