Alireza Dalir vs Van Hai Nguyen
World Youth Ch U16 (b), 2009 · Result 0–1 · Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Seville Variation (D87).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alireza Dalir vs Van Hai Nguyen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alireza Dalir (2133)
- Black
- Van Hai Nguyen (2283)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- World Youth Ch U16 (b)
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Seville Variation (D87)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alireza Dalir (2133) and Van Hai Nguyen (2283) was played at World Youth Ch U16 (b) in 2009 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Seville Variation (D87). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alireza Dalir games or Van Hai Nguyen games? This Alireza Dalir vs Van Hai Nguyen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Seville Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alireza Dalir vs Van Hai Nguyen?
Alireza Dalir vs Van Hai Nguyen (2009) finished 0–1, a win for Van Hai Nguyen.
What opening was played in Alireza Dalir vs Van Hai Nguyen?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Seville Variation (ECO D87).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alireza Dalir vs Van Hai Nguyen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.