Max Dahl vs Simen Agdestein
Riga Tech Rapid Open 2022, 2022 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation (A31).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Max Dahl vs Simen Agdestein with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Max Dahl (2166)
- Black
- Simen Agdestein (2576)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Riga Tech Rapid Open 2022
- Year
- 2022
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation (A31)
About this chess game
This chess game between Max Dahl (2166) and Simen Agdestein (2576) was played at Riga Tech Rapid Open 2022 in 2022 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation (A31). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Max Dahl games or Simen Agdestein games? This Max Dahl vs Simen Agdestein encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Max Dahl vs Simen Agdestein?
Max Dahl vs Simen Agdestein (2022) finished 0–1, a win for Simen Agdestein.
What opening was played in Max Dahl vs Simen Agdestein?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation (ECO A31).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Max Dahl vs Simen Agdestein, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.