Armando Daguro Dasalla vs Alejandro Gisbert Mir
2018 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation (A30).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Armando Daguro Dasalla vs Alejandro Gisbert Mir with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Armando Daguro Dasalla (1936)
- Black
- Alejandro Gisbert Mir (1799)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation (A30)
About this chess game
This chess game between Armando Daguro Dasalla (1936) and Alejandro Gisbert Mir (1799) was played in 2018 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation (A30). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Armando Daguro Dasalla games or Alejandro Gisbert Mir games? This Armando Daguro Dasalla vs Alejandro Gisbert Mir encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Armando Daguro Dasalla vs Alejandro Gisbert Mir?
Armando Daguro Dasalla vs Alejandro Gisbert Mir (2018) finished 1–0, a win for Armando Daguro Dasalla.
What opening was played in Armando Daguro Dasalla vs Alejandro Gisbert Mir?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation (ECO A30).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Armando Daguro Dasalla vs Alejandro Gisbert Mir, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.