Ioannis Dabos - Doukas vs Georgios Kadianis
26. EY BU16 2016, 2016 · Result 1–0 · Pirc Defense: Classical Variation (B08).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ioannis Dabos - Doukas vs Georgios Kadianis with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ioannis Dabos - Doukas (1815)
- Black
- Georgios Kadianis (2169)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 26. EY BU16 2016
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Pirc Defense: Classical Variation (B08)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ioannis Dabos - Doukas (1815) and Georgios Kadianis (2169) was played at 26. EY BU16 2016 in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Pirc Defense: Classical Variation (B08). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ioannis Dabos - Doukas games or Georgios Kadianis games? This Ioannis Dabos - Doukas vs Georgios Kadianis encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Pirc Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ioannis Dabos - Doukas vs Georgios Kadianis?
Ioannis Dabos - Doukas vs Georgios Kadianis (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Ioannis Dabos - Doukas.
What opening was played in Ioannis Dabos - Doukas vs Georgios Kadianis?
The game opened with the Pirc Defense: Classical Variation (ECO B08).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ioannis Dabos - Doukas vs Georgios Kadianis, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.