Wagner Jose Da Silva vs Eduardo Medeiros Milanez
2016 · Result ½–½ · Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B18).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Wagner Jose Da Silva vs Eduardo Medeiros Milanez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Wagner Jose Da Silva (1895)
- Black
- Eduardo Medeiros Milanez (1779)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B18)
About this chess game
This chess game between Wagner Jose Da Silva (1895) and Eduardo Medeiros Milanez (1779) was played in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B18). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Wagner Jose Da Silva games or Eduardo Medeiros Milanez games? This Wagner Jose Da Silva vs Eduardo Medeiros Milanez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Wagner Jose Da Silva vs Eduardo Medeiros Milanez?
Wagner Jose Da Silva vs Eduardo Medeiros Milanez (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Wagner Jose Da Silva vs Eduardo Medeiros Milanez?
The game opened with the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (ECO B18).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Wagner Jose Da Silva vs Eduardo Medeiros Milanez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.