Luiz Antonio Da Silva Tomaz vs Luiz Soares de Macedo
2014 · Result 1–0 · Ruy Lopez: Steinitz Defense (C62).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Luiz Antonio Da Silva Tomaz vs Luiz Soares de Macedo with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Luiz Antonio Da Silva Tomaz (1930)
- Black
- Luiz Soares de Macedo (1652)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Ruy Lopez: Steinitz Defense (C62)
About this chess game
This chess game between Luiz Antonio Da Silva Tomaz (1930) and Luiz Soares de Macedo (1652) was played in 2014 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Ruy Lopez: Steinitz Defense (C62). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Luiz Antonio Da Silva Tomaz games or Luiz Soares de Macedo games? This Luiz Antonio Da Silva Tomaz vs Luiz Soares de Macedo encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Ruy Lopez: Steinitz Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Luiz Antonio Da Silva Tomaz vs Luiz Soares de Macedo?
Luiz Antonio Da Silva Tomaz vs Luiz Soares de Macedo (2014) finished 1–0, a win for Luiz Antonio Da Silva Tomaz.
What opening was played in Luiz Antonio Da Silva Tomaz vs Luiz Soares de Macedo?
The game opened with the Ruy Lopez: Steinitz Defense (ECO C62).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Luiz Antonio Da Silva Tomaz vs Luiz Soares de Macedo, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.