Cleber Lemos Da Rocha vs Dirceu Viana
Rio de Janeiro Ch Absoluto, 1988 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation (D21).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Cleber Lemos Da Rocha vs Dirceu Viana with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Cleber Lemos Da Rocha (1704)
- Black
- Dirceu Viana (2400)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Rio de Janeiro Ch Absoluto
- Year
- 1988
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation (D21)
About this chess game
This chess game between Cleber Lemos Da Rocha (1704) and Dirceu Viana (2400) was played at Rio de Janeiro Ch Absoluto in 1988 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation (D21). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Cleber Lemos Da Rocha games or Dirceu Viana games? This Cleber Lemos Da Rocha vs Dirceu Viana encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Cleber Lemos Da Rocha vs Dirceu Viana?
Cleber Lemos Da Rocha vs Dirceu Viana (1988) finished 0–1, a win for Dirceu Viana.
What opening was played in Cleber Lemos Da Rocha vs Dirceu Viana?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation (ECO D21).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Cleber Lemos Da Rocha vs Dirceu Viana, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.