Eduardo Cesar Da Matta vs Daniel Mattos Marcolino
2015 · Result 1–0 · French Defense: Tarrasch Variation (C03).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Eduardo Cesar Da Matta vs Daniel Mattos Marcolino with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Eduardo Cesar Da Matta (1918)
- Black
- Daniel Mattos Marcolino (2070)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- French Defense: Tarrasch Variation (C03)
About this chess game
This chess game between Eduardo Cesar Da Matta (1918) and Daniel Mattos Marcolino (2070) was played in 2015 and finished 1–0. The opening was the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation (C03). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Eduardo Cesar Da Matta games or Daniel Mattos Marcolino games? This Eduardo Cesar Da Matta vs Daniel Mattos Marcolino encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Eduardo Cesar Da Matta vs Daniel Mattos Marcolino?
Eduardo Cesar Da Matta vs Daniel Mattos Marcolino (2015) finished 1–0, a win for Eduardo Cesar Da Matta.
What opening was played in Eduardo Cesar Da Matta vs Daniel Mattos Marcolino?
The game opened with the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation (ECO C03).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Eduardo Cesar Da Matta vs Daniel Mattos Marcolino, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.