Giovanni Maciel Da Cunha vs Emerson de Sousa Veiga
2017 · Result 0–1 · Benoni Defense: King's Pawn Line (A65).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Giovanni Maciel Da Cunha vs Emerson de Sousa Veiga with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Giovanni Maciel Da Cunha (1988)
- Black
- Emerson de Sousa Veiga (2064)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Benoni Defense: King's Pawn Line (A65)
About this chess game
This chess game between Giovanni Maciel Da Cunha (1988) and Emerson de Sousa Veiga (2064) was played in 2017 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Benoni Defense: King's Pawn Line (A65). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Giovanni Maciel Da Cunha games or Emerson de Sousa Veiga games? This Giovanni Maciel Da Cunha vs Emerson de Sousa Veiga encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Benoni Defense: King's Pawn Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Giovanni Maciel Da Cunha vs Emerson de Sousa Veiga?
Giovanni Maciel Da Cunha vs Emerson de Sousa Veiga (2017) finished 0–1, a win for Emerson de Sousa Veiga.
What opening was played in Giovanni Maciel Da Cunha vs Emerson de Sousa Veiga?
The game opened with the Benoni Defense: King's Pawn Line (ECO A65).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Giovanni Maciel Da Cunha vs Emerson de Sousa Veiga, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.