Samir Hejazi Da Costa vs Mateus De Camargo
2011 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (D31).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Samir Hejazi Da Costa vs Mateus De Camargo with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Samir Hejazi Da Costa (1882)
- Black
- Mateus De Camargo (2087)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (D31)
About this chess game
This chess game between Samir Hejazi Da Costa (1882) and Mateus De Camargo (2087) was played in 2011 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (D31). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Samir Hejazi Da Costa games or Mateus De Camargo games? This Samir Hejazi Da Costa vs Mateus De Camargo encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Samir Hejazi Da Costa vs Mateus De Camargo?
Samir Hejazi Da Costa vs Mateus De Camargo (2011) finished 0–1, a win for Mateus De Camargo.
What opening was played in Samir Hejazi Da Costa vs Mateus De Camargo?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (ECO D31).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Samir Hejazi Da Costa vs Mateus De Camargo, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.