Tomasz Czarkowski vs Sylwester Piotr Grabarczyk
2015 · Result 1–0 · Dutch Defense: Queen's Knight Variation (A85).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Tomasz Czarkowski vs Sylwester Piotr Grabarczyk with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Tomasz Czarkowski (1853)
- Black
- Sylwester Piotr Grabarczyk (1688)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Queen's Knight Variation (A85)
About this chess game
This chess game between Tomasz Czarkowski (1853) and Sylwester Piotr Grabarczyk (1688) was played in 2015 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Queen's Knight Variation (A85). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Tomasz Czarkowski games or Sylwester Piotr Grabarczyk games? This Tomasz Czarkowski vs Sylwester Piotr Grabarczyk encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Queen's Knight Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Tomasz Czarkowski vs Sylwester Piotr Grabarczyk?
Tomasz Czarkowski vs Sylwester Piotr Grabarczyk (2015) finished 1–0, a win for Tomasz Czarkowski.
What opening was played in Tomasz Czarkowski vs Sylwester Piotr Grabarczyk?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Queen's Knight Variation (ECO A85).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Tomasz Czarkowski vs Sylwester Piotr Grabarczyk, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.