Piotr Czaplinski vs Bogdan Babecki
60. Akiba Rubinstein Festival | Open C, 2024 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Lasker Defense (D53).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Piotr Czaplinski vs Bogdan Babecki with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Piotr Czaplinski (1760)
- Black
- Bogdan Babecki (1742)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 60. Akiba Rubinstein Festival | Open C
- Year
- 2024
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Lasker Defense (D53)
About this chess game
This chess game between Piotr Czaplinski (1760) and Bogdan Babecki (1742) was played at 60. Akiba Rubinstein Festival | Open C in 2024 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Lasker Defense (D53). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Piotr Czaplinski games or Bogdan Babecki games? This Piotr Czaplinski vs Bogdan Babecki encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Lasker Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Piotr Czaplinski vs Bogdan Babecki?
Piotr Czaplinski vs Bogdan Babecki (2024) finished 1–0, a win for Piotr Czaplinski.
What opening was played in Piotr Czaplinski vs Bogdan Babecki?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Lasker Defense (ECO D53).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Piotr Czaplinski vs Bogdan Babecki, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.