Karina Cyfka vs Zbigniew Strzemiecki
2011 · Result 1–0 · French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Guimard Defense, Main Line (C04).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Karina Cyfka vs Zbigniew Strzemiecki with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Karina Cyfka (2353)
- Black
- Zbigniew Strzemiecki (2421)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Guimard Defense, Main Line (C04)
About this chess game
This chess game between Karina Cyfka (2353) and Zbigniew Strzemiecki (2421) was played in 2011 and finished 1–0. The opening was the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Guimard Defense, Main Line (C04). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Karina Cyfka games or Zbigniew Strzemiecki games? This Karina Cyfka vs Zbigniew Strzemiecki encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Guimard Defense, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Karina Cyfka vs Zbigniew Strzemiecki?
Karina Cyfka vs Zbigniew Strzemiecki (2011) finished 1–0, a win for Karina Cyfka.
What opening was played in Karina Cyfka vs Zbigniew Strzemiecki?
The game opened with the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Guimard Defense, Main Line (ECO C04).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Karina Cyfka vs Zbigniew Strzemiecki, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.