Ognjen Cvitan vs Richard Dudek
2015 · Result ½–½ · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Gligoric System, Bernstein Defense (E56).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ognjen Cvitan vs Richard Dudek with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ognjen Cvitan (2509)
- Black
- Richard Dudek (2241)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Gligoric System, Bernstein Defense (E56)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ognjen Cvitan (2509) and Richard Dudek (2241) was played in 2015 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Gligoric System, Bernstein Defense (E56). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ognjen Cvitan games or Richard Dudek games? This Ognjen Cvitan vs Richard Dudek encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Gligoric System, Bernstein Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ognjen Cvitan vs Richard Dudek?
Ognjen Cvitan vs Richard Dudek (2015) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Ognjen Cvitan vs Richard Dudek?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Gligoric System, Bernstein Defense (ECO E56).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ognjen Cvitan vs Richard Dudek, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.