Walter Cuevas Araya vs Alvaro Monrroy Cancino
2015 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Walter Cuevas Araya vs Alvaro Monrroy Cancino with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Walter Cuevas Araya (2193)
- Black
- Alvaro Monrroy Cancino (1844)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94)
About this chess game
This chess game between Walter Cuevas Araya (2193) and Alvaro Monrroy Cancino (1844) was played in 2015 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Walter Cuevas Araya games or Alvaro Monrroy Cancino games? This Walter Cuevas Araya vs Alvaro Monrroy Cancino encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Walter Cuevas Araya vs Alvaro Monrroy Cancino?
Walter Cuevas Araya vs Alvaro Monrroy Cancino (2015) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Walter Cuevas Araya vs Alvaro Monrroy Cancino?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (ECO E94).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Walter Cuevas Araya vs Alvaro Monrroy Cancino, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.