Jo Cubas vs Felipe de Cresce El Debs
Osasco 60 Anos GM, 2022 · Result 0–1 · Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted (C67).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jo Cubas vs Felipe de Cresce El Debs with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jo Cubas (1675)
- Black
- Felipe de Cresce El Debs (2553)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Osasco 60 Anos GM
- Year
- 2022
- Opening
- Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted (C67)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jo Cubas (1675) and Felipe de Cresce El Debs (2553) was played at Osasco 60 Anos GM in 2022 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted (C67). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jo Cubas games or Felipe de Cresce El Debs games? This Jo Cubas vs Felipe de Cresce El Debs encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jo Cubas vs Felipe de Cresce El Debs?
Jo Cubas vs Felipe de Cresce El Debs (2022) finished 0–1, a win for Felipe de Cresce El Debs.
What opening was played in Jo Cubas vs Felipe de Cresce El Debs?
The game opened with the Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted (ECO C67).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jo Cubas vs Felipe de Cresce El Debs, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.