Juan Miguel Cubas Pons vs Lorenzo Abrines Sampol
2017 · Result 1–0 · Caro-Kann Defense: Finnish Variation (B16).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Juan Miguel Cubas Pons vs Lorenzo Abrines Sampol with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Juan Miguel Cubas Pons (2176)
- Black
- Lorenzo Abrines Sampol (1689)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Caro-Kann Defense: Finnish Variation (B16)
About this chess game
This chess game between Juan Miguel Cubas Pons (2176) and Lorenzo Abrines Sampol (1689) was played in 2017 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Caro-Kann Defense: Finnish Variation (B16). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Juan Miguel Cubas Pons games or Lorenzo Abrines Sampol games? This Juan Miguel Cubas Pons vs Lorenzo Abrines Sampol encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Caro-Kann Defense: Finnish Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Juan Miguel Cubas Pons vs Lorenzo Abrines Sampol?
Juan Miguel Cubas Pons vs Lorenzo Abrines Sampol (2017) finished 1–0, a win for Juan Miguel Cubas Pons.
What opening was played in Juan Miguel Cubas Pons vs Lorenzo Abrines Sampol?
The game opened with the Caro-Kann Defense: Finnish Variation (ECO B16).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Juan Miguel Cubas Pons vs Lorenzo Abrines Sampol, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.