Michel Coto Mederos vs Cristian Vitier Vazquez
2016 · Result ½–½ · Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit (A07).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Michel Coto Mederos vs Cristian Vitier Vazquez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Michel Coto Mederos (2357)
- Black
- Cristian Vitier Vazquez (2365)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit (A07)
About this chess game
This chess game between Michel Coto Mederos (2357) and Cristian Vitier Vazquez (2365) was played in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit (A07). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Michel Coto Mederos games or Cristian Vitier Vazquez games? This Michel Coto Mederos vs Cristian Vitier Vazquez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Michel Coto Mederos vs Cristian Vitier Vazquez?
Michel Coto Mederos vs Cristian Vitier Vazquez (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Michel Coto Mederos vs Cristian Vitier Vazquez?
The game opened with the Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit (ECO A07).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Michel Coto Mederos vs Cristian Vitier Vazquez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.