Joan Costas Vivet vs Andreu Gimeno Albareda
2012 · Result 0–1 · King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit (C34).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Joan Costas Vivet vs Andreu Gimeno Albareda with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Joan Costas Vivet (1884)
- Black
- Andreu Gimeno Albareda (1605)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit (C34)
About this chess game
This chess game between Joan Costas Vivet (1884) and Andreu Gimeno Albareda (1605) was played in 2012 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit (C34). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Joan Costas Vivet games or Andreu Gimeno Albareda games? This Joan Costas Vivet vs Andreu Gimeno Albareda encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Joan Costas Vivet vs Andreu Gimeno Albareda?
Joan Costas Vivet vs Andreu Gimeno Albareda (2012) finished 0–1, a win for Andreu Gimeno Albareda.
What opening was played in Joan Costas Vivet vs Andreu Gimeno Albareda?
The game opened with the King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit (ECO C34).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Joan Costas Vivet vs Andreu Gimeno Albareda, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.