Francesco Paolo Costa vs Mario Palladino
ITA/KW2/36 (ITA), 2010 · Result ½–½ · French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System, Main Line (C09).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Francesco Paolo Costa vs Mario Palladino with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Francesco Paolo Costa (2229)
- Black
- Mario Palladino (1475)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- ITA/KW2/36 (ITA)
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System, Main Line (C09)
About this chess game
This chess game between Francesco Paolo Costa (2229) and Mario Palladino (1475) was played at ITA/KW2/36 (ITA) in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System, Main Line (C09). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Francesco Paolo Costa games or Mario Palladino games? This Francesco Paolo Costa vs Mario Palladino encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Francesco Paolo Costa vs Mario Palladino?
Francesco Paolo Costa vs Mario Palladino (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Francesco Paolo Costa vs Mario Palladino?
The game opened with the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System, Main Line (ECO C09).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Francesco Paolo Costa vs Mario Palladino, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.