Rogerio De Souza Costa vs Edvaldo da Cruz Costa
2014 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation (A30).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Rogerio De Souza Costa vs Edvaldo da Cruz Costa with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Rogerio De Souza Costa (1820)
- Black
- Edvaldo da Cruz Costa (1610)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation (A30)
About this chess game
This chess game between Rogerio De Souza Costa (1820) and Edvaldo da Cruz Costa (1610) was played in 2014 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation (A30). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Rogerio De Souza Costa games or Edvaldo da Cruz Costa games? This Rogerio De Souza Costa vs Edvaldo da Cruz Costa encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Rogerio De Souza Costa vs Edvaldo da Cruz Costa?
Rogerio De Souza Costa vs Edvaldo da Cruz Costa (2014) finished 1–0, a win for Rogerio De Souza Costa.
What opening was played in Rogerio De Souza Costa vs Edvaldo da Cruz Costa?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation (ECO A30).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Rogerio De Souza Costa vs Edvaldo da Cruz Costa, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.