António Luís Costa de Oliveira vs Armando Arranja
POR/Cup19 (POR), 2016 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack (B76).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay António Luís Costa de Oliveira vs Armando Arranja with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- Black
- Armando Arranja (1878)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- POR/Cup19 (POR)
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack (B76)
About this chess game
This chess game between António Luís Costa de Oliveira and Armando Arranja (1878) was played at POR/Cup19 (POR) in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack (B76). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more António Luís Costa de Oliveira games or Armando Arranja games? This António Luís Costa de Oliveira vs Armando Arranja encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won António Luís Costa de Oliveira vs Armando Arranja?
António Luís Costa de Oliveira vs Armando Arranja (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Armando Arranja.
What opening was played in António Luís Costa de Oliveira vs Armando Arranja?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack (ECO B76).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of António Luís Costa de Oliveira vs Armando Arranja, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.