Elena-Luminita Cosma vs Jolanta Zawadzka
17. ch-EUR Indiv w 2016, 2016 · Result 0–1 · Indian Defense: Przepiorka Variation (A49).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Elena-Luminita Cosma vs Jolanta Zawadzka with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Elena-Luminita Cosma (2345)
- Black
- Jolanta Zawadzka (2442)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 17. ch-EUR Indiv w 2016
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Indian Defense: Przepiorka Variation (A49)
About this chess game
This chess game between Elena-Luminita Cosma (2345) and Jolanta Zawadzka (2442) was played at 17. ch-EUR Indiv w 2016 in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Indian Defense: Przepiorka Variation (A49). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Elena-Luminita Cosma games or Jolanta Zawadzka games? This Elena-Luminita Cosma vs Jolanta Zawadzka encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Indian Defense: Przepiorka Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Elena-Luminita Cosma vs Jolanta Zawadzka?
Elena-Luminita Cosma vs Jolanta Zawadzka (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Jolanta Zawadzka.
What opening was played in Elena-Luminita Cosma vs Jolanta Zawadzka?
The game opened with the Indian Defense: Przepiorka Variation (ECO A49).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Elena-Luminita Cosma vs Jolanta Zawadzka, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.