Elena-Luminita Cosma vs Corina-Isabela Peptan
10. Kings Blitz RR 2016, 2016 · Result 0–1 · Slav Defense: Modern Line (D11).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Elena-Luminita Cosma vs Corina-Isabela Peptan with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Elena-Luminita Cosma (2324)
- Black
- Corina-Isabela Peptan (2395)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 10. Kings Blitz RR 2016
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Modern Line (D11)
About this chess game
This chess game between Elena-Luminita Cosma (2324) and Corina-Isabela Peptan (2395) was played at 10. Kings Blitz RR 2016 in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Slav Defense: Modern Line (D11). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Elena-Luminita Cosma games or Corina-Isabela Peptan games? This Elena-Luminita Cosma vs Corina-Isabela Peptan encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Modern Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Elena-Luminita Cosma vs Corina-Isabela Peptan?
Elena-Luminita Cosma vs Corina-Isabela Peptan (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Corina-Isabela Peptan.
What opening was played in Elena-Luminita Cosma vs Corina-Isabela Peptan?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Modern Line (ECO D11).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Elena-Luminita Cosma vs Corina-Isabela Peptan, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.