Daniel Cortijo Dominguez vs Pedro Amigo Roman
1992 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation (D35).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Daniel Cortijo Dominguez vs Pedro Amigo Roman with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Daniel Cortijo Dominguez (1645)
- Black
- Pedro Amigo Roman (1873)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 1992
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation (D35)
About this chess game
This chess game between Daniel Cortijo Dominguez (1645) and Pedro Amigo Roman (1873) was played in 1992 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation (D35). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Daniel Cortijo Dominguez games or Pedro Amigo Roman games? This Daniel Cortijo Dominguez vs Pedro Amigo Roman encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Daniel Cortijo Dominguez vs Pedro Amigo Roman?
Daniel Cortijo Dominguez vs Pedro Amigo Roman (1992) finished 0–1, a win for Pedro Amigo Roman.
What opening was played in Daniel Cortijo Dominguez vs Pedro Amigo Roman?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation (ECO D35).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Daniel Cortijo Dominguez vs Pedro Amigo Roman, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.