Frederic Corriguelas Armillas vs Jaume Costa Trave
2016 · Result 0–1 · French Defense: Paulsen Variation (C10).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Frederic Corriguelas Armillas vs Jaume Costa Trave with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Frederic Corriguelas Armillas (1995)
- Black
- Jaume Costa Trave (1885)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- French Defense: Paulsen Variation (C10)
About this chess game
This chess game between Frederic Corriguelas Armillas (1995) and Jaume Costa Trave (1885) was played in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the French Defense: Paulsen Variation (C10). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Frederic Corriguelas Armillas games or Jaume Costa Trave games? This Frederic Corriguelas Armillas vs Jaume Costa Trave encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Paulsen Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Frederic Corriguelas Armillas vs Jaume Costa Trave?
Frederic Corriguelas Armillas vs Jaume Costa Trave (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Jaume Costa Trave.
What opening was played in Frederic Corriguelas Armillas vs Jaume Costa Trave?
The game opened with the French Defense: Paulsen Variation (ECO C10).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Frederic Corriguelas Armillas vs Jaume Costa Trave, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.