Max Do Carmo Correia vs Luciano de Souza Zallio
2012 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (B80).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Max Do Carmo Correia vs Luciano de Souza Zallio with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Max Do Carmo Correia (1964)
- Black
- Luciano de Souza Zallio (2141)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (B80)
About this chess game
This chess game between Max Do Carmo Correia (1964) and Luciano de Souza Zallio (2141) was played in 2012 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (B80). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Max Do Carmo Correia games or Luciano de Souza Zallio games? This Max Do Carmo Correia vs Luciano de Souza Zallio encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Max Do Carmo Correia vs Luciano de Souza Zallio?
Max Do Carmo Correia vs Luciano de Souza Zallio (2012) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Max Do Carmo Correia vs Luciano de Souza Zallio?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (ECO B80).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Max Do Carmo Correia vs Luciano de Souza Zallio, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.