Lorenna Martins Correa vs Milton Kasuo Okamura
2011 · Result 1–0 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Gligoric System, Bronstein Variation (E55).
Analyze this game
Open Lorenna Martins Correa vs Milton Kasuo Okamura on the CipherChess board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Open the Analysis BoardMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Lorenna Martins Correa (1840)
- Black
- Milton Kasuo Okamura (2122)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Gligoric System, Bronstein Variation (E55)
About this chess game
This chess game between Lorenna Martins Correa (1840) and Milton Kasuo Okamura (2122) was played in 2011 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Gligoric System, Bronstein Variation (E55). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Lorenna Martins Correa games or Milton Kasuo Okamura games? This Lorenna Martins Correa vs Milton Kasuo Okamura encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Gligoric System, Bronstein Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Lorenna Martins Correa vs Milton Kasuo Okamura?
Lorenna Martins Correa vs Milton Kasuo Okamura (2011) finished 1–0, a win for Lorenna Martins Correa.
What opening was played in Lorenna Martins Correa vs Milton Kasuo Okamura?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Gligoric System, Bronstein Variation (ECO E55).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Lorenna Martins Correa vs Milton Kasuo Okamura, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.