Claudio Correa De Almeida vs Ozer Ornek
13. LSS Anni P-00015, 2019 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Claudio Correa De Almeida vs Ozer Ornek with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Claudio Correa De Almeida (1548)
- Black
- Ozer Ornek (2234)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 13. LSS Anni P-00015
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02)
About this chess game
This chess game between Claudio Correa De Almeida (1548) and Ozer Ornek (2234) was played at 13. LSS Anni P-00015 in 2019 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Claudio Correa De Almeida games or Ozer Ornek games? This Claudio Correa De Almeida vs Ozer Ornek encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Claudio Correa De Almeida vs Ozer Ornek?
Claudio Correa De Almeida vs Ozer Ornek (2019) finished 1–0, a win for Claudio Correa De Almeida.
What opening was played in Claudio Correa De Almeida vs Ozer Ornek?
The game opened with the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (ECO D02).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Claudio Correa De Almeida vs Ozer Ornek, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.