Breiner Roiser Correa Atucsa vs Luis Miguel Aguilar
2014 · Result ½–½ · Benoni Defense: King's Pawn Line (A65).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Breiner Roiser Correa Atucsa vs Luis Miguel Aguilar with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Breiner Roiser Correa Atucsa (1903)
- Black
- Luis Miguel Aguilar (2035)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Benoni Defense: King's Pawn Line (A65)
About this chess game
This chess game between Breiner Roiser Correa Atucsa (1903) and Luis Miguel Aguilar (2035) was played in 2014 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Benoni Defense: King's Pawn Line (A65). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Breiner Roiser Correa Atucsa games or Luis Miguel Aguilar games? This Breiner Roiser Correa Atucsa vs Luis Miguel Aguilar encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Benoni Defense: King's Pawn Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Breiner Roiser Correa Atucsa vs Luis Miguel Aguilar?
Breiner Roiser Correa Atucsa vs Luis Miguel Aguilar (2014) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Breiner Roiser Correa Atucsa vs Luis Miguel Aguilar?
The game opened with the Benoni Defense: King's Pawn Line (ECO A65).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Breiner Roiser Correa Atucsa vs Luis Miguel Aguilar, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.