Romeo Corradini vs Michael Charles Dudley
Help-UKR S 10 (ITA), 2022 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D05).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Romeo Corradini vs Michael Charles Dudley with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Romeo Corradini
- Black
- Michael Charles Dudley (2064)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Help-UKR S 10 (ITA)
- Year
- 2022
- Opening
- Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D05)
About this chess game
This chess game between Romeo Corradini and Michael Charles Dudley (2064) was played at Help-UKR S 10 (ITA) in 2022 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D05). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Romeo Corradini games or Michael Charles Dudley games? This Romeo Corradini vs Michael Charles Dudley encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Romeo Corradini vs Michael Charles Dudley?
Romeo Corradini vs Michael Charles Dudley (2022) finished 0–1, a win for Michael Charles Dudley.
What opening was played in Romeo Corradini vs Michael Charles Dudley?
The game opened with the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (ECO D05).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Romeo Corradini vs Michael Charles Dudley, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.