Miguel Coria vs Sergio Amilcar Medina
2016 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation (E63).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Miguel Coria vs Sergio Amilcar Medina with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Miguel Coria (1556)
- Black
- Sergio Amilcar Medina (1879)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation (E63)
About this chess game
This chess game between Miguel Coria (1556) and Sergio Amilcar Medina (1879) was played in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation (E63). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Miguel Coria games or Sergio Amilcar Medina games? This Miguel Coria vs Sergio Amilcar Medina encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Miguel Coria vs Sergio Amilcar Medina?
Miguel Coria vs Sergio Amilcar Medina (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Miguel Coria vs Sergio Amilcar Medina?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation (ECO E63).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Miguel Coria vs Sergio Amilcar Medina, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.