Ingo Cordts vs Jasper De Jong
36. Taminco Open, 2013 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation (E18).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ingo Cordts vs Jasper De Jong with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ingo Cordts (2296)
- Black
- Jasper De Jong
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 36. Taminco Open
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation (E18)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ingo Cordts (2296) and Jasper De Jong was played at 36. Taminco Open in 2013 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation (E18). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ingo Cordts games or Jasper De Jong games? This Ingo Cordts vs Jasper De Jong encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ingo Cordts vs Jasper De Jong?
Ingo Cordts vs Jasper De Jong (2013) finished 1–0, a win for Ingo Cordts.
What opening was played in Ingo Cordts vs Jasper De Jong?
The game opened with the Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation (ECO E18).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ingo Cordts vs Jasper De Jong, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.