Jairo Ribeiro Cordioli vs Leonardo Stadler Pezzini
2016 · Result 1–0 · Indian Defense: Budapest Defense (A52).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jairo Ribeiro Cordioli vs Leonardo Stadler Pezzini with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jairo Ribeiro Cordioli (1900)
- Black
- Leonardo Stadler Pezzini (1792)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Indian Defense: Budapest Defense (A52)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jairo Ribeiro Cordioli (1900) and Leonardo Stadler Pezzini (1792) was played in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Indian Defense: Budapest Defense (A52). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jairo Ribeiro Cordioli games or Leonardo Stadler Pezzini games? This Jairo Ribeiro Cordioli vs Leonardo Stadler Pezzini encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Indian Defense: Budapest Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jairo Ribeiro Cordioli vs Leonardo Stadler Pezzini?
Jairo Ribeiro Cordioli vs Leonardo Stadler Pezzini (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Jairo Ribeiro Cordioli.
What opening was played in Jairo Ribeiro Cordioli vs Leonardo Stadler Pezzini?
The game opened with the Indian Defense: Budapest Defense (ECO A52).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jairo Ribeiro Cordioli vs Leonardo Stadler Pezzini, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.