Christina Cordes vs Richard Woerl
17. OIBM 2013, 2013 · Result 1–0 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (E35).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Christina Cordes vs Richard Woerl with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Christina Cordes (2267)
- Black
- Richard Woerl (2051)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 17. OIBM 2013
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (E35)
About this chess game
This chess game between Christina Cordes (2267) and Richard Woerl (2051) was played at 17. OIBM 2013 in 2013 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (E35). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Christina Cordes games or Richard Woerl games? This Christina Cordes vs Richard Woerl encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Christina Cordes vs Richard Woerl?
Christina Cordes vs Richard Woerl (2013) finished 1–0, a win for Christina Cordes.
What opening was played in Christina Cordes vs Richard Woerl?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (ECO E35).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Christina Cordes vs Richard Woerl, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.