Federico Coppola vs Gianmario Petrone
2012 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Poisoned Pawn Variation (B97).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Federico Coppola vs Gianmario Petrone with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Federico Coppola (1825)
- Black
- Gianmario Petrone (1899)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Poisoned Pawn Variation (B97)
About this chess game
This chess game between Federico Coppola (1825) and Gianmario Petrone (1899) was played in 2012 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Poisoned Pawn Variation (B97). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Federico Coppola games or Gianmario Petrone games? This Federico Coppola vs Gianmario Petrone encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Poisoned Pawn Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Federico Coppola vs Gianmario Petrone?
Federico Coppola vs Gianmario Petrone (2012) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Federico Coppola vs Gianmario Petrone?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Poisoned Pawn Variation (ECO B97).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Federico Coppola vs Gianmario Petrone, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.