Xandi Cooke vs Rikard Unelius
129. ch-NZL Rapid 2022, 2022 · Result 0–1 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Zurich Variation (E33).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Xandi Cooke vs Rikard Unelius with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Xandi Cooke (1465)
- Black
- Rikard Unelius (1893)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 129. ch-NZL Rapid 2022
- Year
- 2022
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Zurich Variation (E33)
About this chess game
This chess game between Xandi Cooke (1465) and Rikard Unelius (1893) was played at 129. ch-NZL Rapid 2022 in 2022 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Zurich Variation (E33). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Xandi Cooke games or Rikard Unelius games? This Xandi Cooke vs Rikard Unelius encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Zurich Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Xandi Cooke vs Rikard Unelius?
Xandi Cooke vs Rikard Unelius (2022) finished 0–1, a win for Rikard Unelius.
What opening was played in Xandi Cooke vs Rikard Unelius?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Zurich Variation (ECO E33).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Xandi Cooke vs Rikard Unelius, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.