Julian Conti vs Jose Leonardo Torres
2013 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack, Main Line (B77).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Julian Conti vs Jose Leonardo Torres with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Julian Conti (2034)
- Black
- Jose Leonardo Torres (1915)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack, Main Line (B77)
About this chess game
This chess game between Julian Conti (2034) and Jose Leonardo Torres (1915) was played in 2013 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack, Main Line (B77). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Julian Conti games or Jose Leonardo Torres games? This Julian Conti vs Jose Leonardo Torres encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Julian Conti vs Jose Leonardo Torres?
Julian Conti vs Jose Leonardo Torres (2013) finished 1–0, a win for Julian Conti.
What opening was played in Julian Conti vs Jose Leonardo Torres?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack, Main Line (ECO B77).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Julian Conti vs Jose Leonardo Torres, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.