Kevin John Connelly vs Carlo Bellisario
XV AEAC/P19 (ESP), 2016 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E91).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Kevin John Connelly vs Carlo Bellisario with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Kevin John Connelly (2242)
- Black
- Carlo Bellisario (1651)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- XV AEAC/P19 (ESP)
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E91)
About this chess game
This chess game between Kevin John Connelly (2242) and Carlo Bellisario (1651) was played at XV AEAC/P19 (ESP) in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E91). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Kevin John Connelly games or Carlo Bellisario games? This Kevin John Connelly vs Carlo Bellisario encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Kevin John Connelly vs Carlo Bellisario?
Kevin John Connelly vs Carlo Bellisario (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Kevin John Connelly.
What opening was played in Kevin John Connelly vs Carlo Bellisario?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (ECO E91).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Kevin John Connelly vs Carlo Bellisario, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.